Posts Tagged ‘Margot Robbie’

Harley Quinn (Margot Robbie) has just broken up with the Joker.  The two problems with that are that no one believes her, and she loses the protection that comes with being the Joker’s girlfriend.  So she does what any right-thinking woman would do, she publicly and explosively demonstrates that she and Mr. J. are no longer an item.  This move also announces to enemies that she is alone and unprotected.  Roman Slonis (Ewan McGregor) is a stone-cold killer who runs a club in Gotham City.  Roman wants to find the Bertinelli diamond, the diamond has a secret within it, and with that diamond in his possession, he can buy off every judge and policeman in Gotham, and rule that town. 

At first, Roman wants to kill Harley, but then he offers her protection in exchange for Harley finding the diamond.  He also asks hired muscle Victor Zsasz (Chris Messina) and singer at his club, Dinah Lance (Jurnee Smolett) to keep an eye on Harley and get the diamond if Harley gets any funny ideas.  Soon, everyone has an interest in finding that diamond. Police officer Renee Montoya (Rosie Perez) and a woman who dubs herself the Huntress (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) and kills her victims with a crossbow, but only a 14-year-old girl named Cassandra Cain (Ella Jay Basco) knows where the diamond is, and she’s not telling anyone.  Can Harley find the diamond?  And what will she do with it if she finds it? 

This is a surprisingly good script.  There is very good character development, an engaging plot, and even some atypical mentorship between Harley and teenaged Cassandra.  This film is a throwback to the 1960’s Batman television series lots of campy laughs, and more cartoonish violence than blood and gore.  Despite the broad comedic strokes, Birds of Prey really does try to be a woman’s empowerment film.   There are serious moments, where Harley and other women in the film are threatened with harassment and worse.   There is also scant mention of the Joker, and all the protagonists are women, and the antagonists are men, maybe that’s too simplistic, but sometimes the most effective ideas are expressed simply. Of course, the women’s empowerment theme is somewhat diminished by having a protagonist running around in shorts and a tee-shirt, but blame that on the guys who designed Harley Quinn as a comic book character, not the writer of this film. 

Where this film goes awry is the acting.  Margot Robbie is a good actress.  But she lays on the New York accent really thick and sound like a dime store version of Cyndi Lauper.  She can do better than that.  She undercuts any credibility the character has with that awful accent.  Rosie Perez who has a real New York accent, is very good in this movie, she mixes comedy and drama expertly, where has she been all these years?  Ewan McGregor, usually a fine actor, goes way over the top with this role.  His scenery chewing goes above and beyond the spirit of this role.  And he mixes up his American and Scottish accents into a muddle. Jurnee Smolett is not up to the task of playing both a serious and funny role, and her dye job is reminiscent of Elizabeth Berkley, and that is never a good thing.  Mary Elizabeth Winstead is very good in an understated performance as the Huntress.  And Ella Jay Basco is a precocious teen playing a precocious teen, but she has good chemistry with Margot Robbie. 

The direction is not as good as it should be either.   the fight scenes seem very choreographed, like each villain takes a punch at Harley and backs off, and then another goon comes in and fights for a while.  The dream sequence with Harley as Marilyn Monroe really backfires.  If the director, Cathy Yan, wants little girls to emulate Harley in some positive way, does she want to use a song popularized by a 1960’s sex symbol with essential the same costume and setting?  That said, the director gives plenty of time for backstories and good plot development, without the usual barrage of special effects. 

Birds of Prey: Don’t call these birds chicks.

once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-

In 1969, aging actor Rick Dalton, (Leonardo DiCaprio) is looking to stay relevant.    He was a big tv star in the 50’s, on the show Bounty Law, who went off to do movies, and is now back on the small screen shooting a pilot for the t.v. show Lancer, as a villain. The years have taken their toll on Rick, he is an alcoholic who can’t remember his lines.  Rick’s neighbor Sharon Tate’s (Margot Robbie) career is just beginning her movie career starring with Dean Martin in a Matt Helm film, The Wrecking Crew, but her career is definitely on the ascendancy.   Rick’s stunt double, Cliff Booth (Brad Pitt) was with him in the good days, and has stayed loyal to him in the lean times, he is Rick’s driver and handyman.

Several times when driving Rick around Hollywood, Cliff notices a teenage girl named Pussycat (Margaret Qualley) who flirts with Cliff and he flirts back.   After he picks her up in Rick’s Cadillac, Cliff realizes that Pussycat is too young, but agrees to take her to Spahn’s Ranch, where he once worked.  He wants to reconnect with George Spahn (Bruce Dern) and make sure he’s ok.  What does Cliff find when he gets to Spahn’s Ranch?

This is an odd movie.  It seems to graft Clint Eastwood’s career in the 50’s and 60’s onto a character named Rick Dalton, and gives him a stunt double buddy, like Burt Reynolds and Hal Needham in the 70’s.  Once Upon A Time could have been a good film as a Hollywood buddy movie with lots of commentary about the disposable nature of Hollywood actors and actresses, but writer Quentin Tarantino inexplicably puts Rick and Cliff in the middle of a true crime story, and then changes the facts of the true crime story to editorialize on the hippie culture of the 1960’s.  This turns the movie into a trainwreck, which is sad because he got many other details of the true crime story right. This makes the denouement even harder to understand.  The movie is violent , but not in the way that viewers may think.   Tarantino even takes cheap shots at Bruce Lee, who is dead and can’t defend himself.  This and The Hateful Eight mark a low point in his screenwriting skills, even for die-hard Tarantino fans.

The acting is good.   Brad Pitt is believable as a  stuntman.  The idea of Pretty Boy Pitt playing a stuntman may seem amusing, but he pulls it off with a laid-back simmering intensity, and he rounds out the performance by injecting just enough humor.  The best performance by far in this film is done by Leonardo DiCaprio, there is one scene in particular, where he describes a book he’s reading to a precocious 8 year old method actress, and that is the heart and soul of the film, or should have been, it is a great speech, delivered with just the right amount of emotion.  He got an Oscar nomination for this role, and he deserved it.  He will unfortunately lose to Joaquin Phoenix, too bad.  Margot Robbie plays Sharon Tate as a pretty party girl, the script doesn’t call on her to do much, and she doesn’t add anything to the role to distinguish herself.  Julia Butters makes the most of a small role as a self-assured 8  year-old method actress,  who at first makes fun of DiCaprio’s character and then sympathizes and even helps him.  It’s a nice turn for a 10 year old actress.

The direction is gimmicky, full of odd angles and crane shots.  Tarantino inserts Rick Dalton in one famous, and some fictional movies.  Placing a fictional character in a real life situation is nothing new.  Robert Zemekis did it first and better in Forest Gump.  Tarantino makes another amateurish decision by inserting a narrator into the film for exposition purposes.  He tries to redeem himself by satirizing himself in the fake film 14 Fists of McCloskey, a film about a Nazi killing group of criminals.   Does that plot ring any bells?  Once Upon a Time In Hollywood is a good visual representation of California in the late 60’s an even as a behind the sceenes look at directing. Unfortunately, the film clocks in at an unwieldy 2 hours and 41 minutes, and a lot of those scenes could have been cut, but Tarantino the director loves Tarantino the writer, and refuses to edit this film, audience be damned.

Once Upon A Time In Hollywood:  Fiction meets reality in a helter-skelter way.

 

i tonya

Tonya Harding (Margot Robbie) was obsessed with ice skating from the time she was three years old.  Her mother Lavona (Allison Janney) helped her train, but was also verbally and physically abusive to Tonya.  When she was 15, Tonya met Jeff Gillooly (Sebastian Stan) and although he abused her too, she married him, and continued her skating career.  The abuse got so bad that she put out a restraining order on him, she stayed with him, but after placing fourth in the 1992 Olympic games she divorced Gilooly in 1993 and tried to make the Olympic team.  She tried to reconcile with her mother and Gillooly and made the 1994 Olympic team, but Gilloly and Tonya’s bodyguard Shawn Eckhardt (Paul Walter Hauser) are coming up with a plan to help Tonya win a medal in the 1994 Olympics, what is the plan?  Does it help Tonya Harding or hurt her?

When a movie starts out with essentially a three line disclaimer about the contents of the film, the viewer better buckle up, because there’s going to be a battle coming with the truth.  The problem with this film is that it’s not really a biographical film, it’s more an advocacy film.  From the first frame, it advocates Tonya Harding’s position, and uses the fact that she may have been abused to excuse her attitude and behavior.  It replaces fact with opinion, and that should never happen with a biographical film.  Tonya Harding had talent, but when the time came to show that talent, she blew it.  Even before her free skate which the movie focuses on, she was in 10th place, so her lack of focus betrayed her talent, and that’s what the movie should have been about.  The movie treats the whole fiasco, like a comedy which is tone deaf.  There were a lot of serious issues in this movie, which shouldn’t have been handled so lightly.

The acting is much better than the material deserved.  Margot Robbie almost succeeded in making Tonya Harding a sympathetic character and that is one hell of an acting job.  Harding has the personality of a sour persimmon.  Sebastian Stan is surprisingly versatile in this role, humorous one minute, and menacing the next.  Surprising, since he was kind of a monotone actor as Bucky Barnes.  Allison Janney did her best, but the character is too one-dimensional, no human being is that singularly cruel.  Human beings are complex people, who don’t operate under one set of emotions.  Janney doesn’t get to show any different sides, because the character is written as a mean, spiteful vindictive person, all the time.  Paul Walter Hauser is very funny as Shawn Eckhardt, a man with delusions of being a spy, even though he lives with his parents.  Hauser has excellent timing and a deadpan delivery.

The direction is done much in a fake documentary style, with hand held-video-cam footage, which is meant to boost the humor, but doesn’t do much for the pacing.  The director tries to make the skating sequences more exciting, by zooming in for close-up shots, but how exciting is ice skating anyway? Not very.  There was also a lot of breaking down the fourth wall, or talking directly to the audience, a technique popularized by Woody Allen in his early comedies.  Again, this technique is good for the comedic elements of the movie, not so good for the dramatic elements.

I Tonya.  On thin ice.

SUICIDE SQUAD

Amanda Waller (Viola Davis) wants to put together a group of criminals for a secret mission.  Deadshot (Will Smith) is a hitman, Harley Quinn (Margot Robbie) was a psychiatrist, who went crazy treating the Joker. (Jared Leto) Killer Croc,(Adewale Akinnuoye  Agbage) some kind of hybrid between a human and a crocodile.  Diablo, (Jay Hernandez) a man who can conjure fire instantly.  June Moone, (Cara Delveigne) an anthropologist, whose soul is occupied by a witch named Enchantress. Rick Flag, (Joel Kinnaman) June’s military boyfriend. George Harkness, an Australian criminal, serving a triple life sentence, and Katana, a female ninja avenging the death of her husband.  All these shady characters agree to this mission for time off their sentences, and Rick assumes he can control June, but Enchantress has her own ideas. What is the mission that the Suicide Squad agrees to?  Do they succeed?

The difference between a great superhero film, and a run of the mill superhero film are numerous.  In a great superhero film, the protagonist well-drawn, and sympathetic, the viewer wants this character to succeed.  In a great superhero film, the storyline becomes about much more than who wins or who loses, it becomes about larger themes like the nature of man.  In a great superhero film, the climax fit the rest of the story, and the viewer feels thrilled, and awaits the ending.  Suicide Squad is not a great superhero film, the characters are paper thin, the plot inches along looking for excitement, and finds none, the climax is as exciting as a shrug of the shoulders, and the ending is routine.  The movie needed a lot more backstory for character development, and a deeper more exciting plot, but the viewer doesn’t get that. Combine a dull plot with bad acting and you’ve got this film.

Viola Davis is the best actor in this film.  She at least held my attention.  Will Smith is still trying desperately to regain the mojo that made him bankable box office in the mid 1990’s, but this film won’t do it.  His character at least has two dimensions most of the characters aren’t that well-developed. But Smith has lost that swagger from his early movies, and he hasn’t really replaced it with anything.  I liked Margot Robbie in the Wolf of Wall Street,  but she plays Harley Quinn like a total airhead. And her Aussie accent sneaks in once in a while. Jared Leto plays the Joker like a low rent Heath Ledger, it’s a pale imitation of Heath Ledger’s masterful performance, but Leto never makes it his own. Leto is a better actor than he shows in this role and that is a disappointment.  The other actors are not worth mentioning because the characters are so poorly drawn that these actors could not bring anything to them.

David Ayer is the director and writer of this film.  He wrote Training Day, so he is capable of writing a good film, but his writing is bad in this film,  and his direction is also poor.  The pacing of this film is very slow, it’s a long film that takes forever to get where its going and when it gets there, the viewer can’t help but wonder if that is all there was to the movie. He gets terrible performances and the special effects are underwhelming.

Suicide Squad: Killing the careers of its actors.

whiskey tango foxtrot

Kim Baker (Tina Fey) is a journalist who writes for the taking heads on television.  In 2003, while most journalists are covering the war in Iraq, Baker is asked to go to Afghanistan, and become a war correspondent.    Baker decides to go, leaving her serious boyfriend, Chris (Josh Charles) behind. Shortly after arriving, she meets her translator Fahim, (Christopher Abbott) the head of security detail, Nic, (Stephen Peacocke) and fellow female reporter Tanya Vanderpoel (Margot Robbie)  She starts out as a Marine Embed, and gets stories from Afghan women, and eventually get to interview the Afghan Attorney General Ali Massoud Saddiq.(Alfred Molina)  Baker is staying in Afghanistan longer than expected, and that takes a toll on her relationship at home.  She finds out that Chris is cheating on her, and starts thinking about starting a relationship of her own. Reeling from the end of her relationship, Baker finds solace in the arms of Iain McKelpie (Martin Freeman) a lecherous Scottish journalist who hits on any woman in the country.

Despite her interviews with solders, and high ranking government officials, Baker gets scooped by Tanya, who gets caught in the crossfire of a U.S. drone attack, and whose video of that attack goes viral.  Baker needs a big story to keep her job, she turns to Iain, who is working on a story about Chinese involvement in Afghanistan, that could be huge.  But while Iain is working on that story, he is kidnapped a held for ransom.  Baker has to use all her connections in the Marines and to the Afghan government to try to get Iain back, and if she does so, she could score the biggest story of her life.  Does she succeed in helping to find Iain?

I did not like Whiskey Tango Foxtrot.  It tries to do too many things, is it a war movie, is it a comedy, is it a relationship movie?  It tries to be all of these things, and does not succeed at any of them.  It has to be a war movie, because Kim baker is a war correspondent.  But it tries to be too irreverent, by sending Baker to parties and weddings, and even throwing in some unnecessary bathroom humor.  A war comedy is a hard trick to pull off, Doctor Stangelove and MASH were probably the two best ones, and this does not come close to that.  The story becomes about the reporters and how competitive they are to get a story, and that should not be the central theme in a story about the war in Afghanistan.  War correspondents have a dangerous and sometimes deadly job, this film did not portray that aspect of Baker’s job well enough. Ultimately, none of the characters are very likeable, so there’s no one here to root for.

Tina Fey tries to be funny, and hip, and self-deprecating,  dropping one-liners in her trademark style, but ultimately the script fails her, and she is left to flounder in a semi-serious half-baked comedy. Margot Robbie livens things up as a seasoned Aussie reporter, who will do almost anything for a good story.  She is not really a good person in this role, but she plays the role of frenemy well. Robbie has played a lot of different roles in her short career, and is building a versatile resume, as either a comedic or serious actress.  Martin Freeman tries to play the smarmy love interest here and that’s a bridge too far for him.  I will always consider him a good guy, and he should stick to those good guy roles.  Alfred Molina is a dubious choice to play the Afghan attorney general, and the script makes him do insulting things, so it’s not a shining moment for Mr. Molina. Very few of the Afghan roles are played by Muslims, so this is another case of Hollywood whitewashing.

The direction is ok, the pacing is slow,  this is the directing team who have directed such movies as I Love  You Phillip Morris Focus, and Crazy, Stupid Love.  The pacing was slow they only got a good performance from Robbie.  There were also no great visuals in the film, so the direction is nothing notable.

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot:  WTF indeed.

Movie Review: Focus (2015)

Posted: October 30, 2015 in Drama
Tags: ,

focus

Nicky (Will Smith) is a con-man, who’s turned stealing small things into big business.  He takes a newbie named Jess (Margot Robbie) under his wing, and teaches her the fine art of the con.  The pair makes 1.2 million during Super Bowl weekend and con a Chinese gambler named Liyuan (BD Wong) out of another 2 million, Jess also falls in love with Nicky.  But Nicky feels that he is getting to close to Jess, and so he gives her 80, 000 dollars and ends the relationship.  Three years later, Nicky is hired by the head of an Argentinian racing team named Garriga (Rodrigo Santoro) to protect an algorithm that Garriga has come up with to make his team’s cars go a little faster than the other cars.  Nicky is supposed to con the other team owners with a fake algorithm. But then Jess shows up in Argentina, and tells Nicky that she is Garriga’s girlfriend, and that she’s gone straight, and given up conning people for good.  What is Nicky’s reaction, does he continue to help Garriga?  Is Jess really Garriga’s girlfriend or is she conning him?

This movie gets off to a good start.  Nicky explains the rules of a good con game to Jess, there’s a little comedy thrown in, it was a really interesting movie for about half an hour,  technically what Nicky and his team were doing in New Orleans was nothing more than glorified pickpocketing, but I was willing to let that go.  The scenes with Liyuan were badly written, I would have done something else entirely.  The con in Argentina was thoroughly uninteresting,  and the re-emergence of Jess was badly written.  I would have done something much more interesting with Jess, another wasted character.

Will Smith is smooth and polished as the con man, he shows that he still has comedic chops too, it was a good performance by Smith in a comeback after trying, and failing to create an acting career for his son Jaden. Margot Robbie is stunning to look at, and she handles the early scenes well, but by the time the movie gets to Argentina, she is used as little more than window dressing, and that is a shame.  Robbie does a great American accent, I did not even know she was Australian, until after I saw The Wolf of Wall Street. BD Wong  was severely underutilized, I would have used him in a different, more interesting way.  He is a much better actor than this movie shows, check out his performance as White Rose in Mr. Robot.

The direction is stylish and shows New Orleans in a glamorous light, great cinematography. Ironically, the directors are the writers, the performances were not that great, so I would say that these directors are not great actor’s directors, so I would say keep the visual aspects of your directing, stop writing completely.

Focus:  Unclear what the point of this movie is.

about time

At age 21, Tim (Domhall Gleeson) is told by his father, James, (Bill Nighy) that all male members of his family can travel through time.  Tim uses this knowledge to try to fix his love life.  The first target de amore for Tim is his sister Kit Kat’s (Lydia Wilson) boyfriend’s sister, Charlotte, (Margot Robbie) who’s going to stay with Tim for two months.  Despite many trips  back in time, Charlotte doesn’t seem interested in Tim.  Tim moves on, and meets Mary (Rachel McAdams) and falls madly in love with her.  With many trips back and forth in time, Tim and Mary’s relationship seems perfect.  Then just as suddenly as she left, Charlotte comes back.  Who will Tim choose, his first love or his newest love?

I did not like About Time.  It is full of insipid dialogue, mostly for Mary.  Mary loves model Kate Moss for some unexplained reason, and Tim goes back in time to get his response about Kate Moss right.  When Mary wants to make love, she says something like “I’ll be in my pajamas, you can come and take a look if you want.”  The story turns on a dime, and becomes predictably weepy and manipulative, because the story has nowhere else to turn.  Finally, at 2 hours and ten minutes, the script is much too long to maintain anyone’s interest, I stopped caring about any of these characters long before the movie ended. The best of the time travel movies, Back To The Future set a seminal rule for time travel movies, if a character changes things in the past, his future will change, this movie kind of make the time travel rules as they go, and that doesn’t work.

The acting is pretty bad.  Things were going along well enough with Gleeson and Margot Robbie, and along comes Rachel McAdams, wearing some kind of ugly hairpiece or haircut , to make herself look more mousy and unattractive and speaking with a distinctively American accent.  There is no explanation of what this particular American is doing in England, no backstory for her character.  So there is no other conclusion but that McAdams is such a limited actress that she can’t even fake an English accent.  I think she tried in the Sherlock Holmes movies, and the accent wasn’t that great.  She did a time travel movie already which was actually just as bad as this one, but at least she wasn’t pretending to be insecure.

The problem with Domhalll Gleeson is that he looks like he’s about 12 years old, and Rachel McAdams looks much older than that with her mousy wig and frumpy clothes.  Chemistry in a film starts with a physical attraction, and there didn’t seem to be one here.  The couple that would have worked here is Gleeson and Margot Robbie, they’re close enough in age, and there seemed to be a spark in the scenes they did together, but the producers probably wanted a big name and so they signed McAdams as a box office draw.  The only good news is that Bill Nighy was solid once again in another character role, and Robbie was good in too small a supporting role.

The pacing was slow, slow, slow, adding to an overlong running time.  I was wondering if it was ever going to end.  Thankfully it did.

About Time: About Time McAdams stopped making cheesy rom coms.

the-wolf-of-wall-street

At age 22, Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DeCaprio) gets a plum job with a prestigious brokerage.  He is taught the ropes of being a successful broker by Mark Hanna. (Matthew McConaughey) Hanna’s advice to Jordan, take a lot of drugs, pleasure yourself twice a day and separate your client’s cash from your client.  As soon as Jordan gets his series 7 license, black Monday occurs on October 19th 1987, and Jordan finds himself out of a job.  He works for a while in a small brokerage on Long Island, where he sells penny stocks to unsuspecting clients , making 50% commission.  A friend, Donnie Azoff (Jonah Hill) is so impressed with Jordan’s take home pay that he quits his job to become a broker.  It is then that Jordan starts Stratton Oakmont in an abandoned auto garage.  He staffs Stratton with old friends from the neighborhood, most of them small time drug dealers.  Nicky Koskof (PJ Byrne) nicknamed Rugrat, because of his bad hairpiece, Chester Ming, (Kenneth Choi)  Robbie Feinberg,(Brian Sacca)  and Alden Kupferberg  (Henry Zebrowski)  join Jordan and Donnie at Stratton, and by promising to sell blue chip stocks and really selling lousy penny stocks, Jordan and his cohorts rake in lots of money.

Jordan agrees to speak to Forbes magazine for what he thinks is a puff piece, the Forbes reporter nicknames him the Wolf Of Wall Street.  Not only doesn’t this hurt his reputation, lots of newly minted brokers want to work for Stratton.  Jordan realizes that the next big step for the brokerage is to sell an IPO, initial public offering of a newly formed company.  Donnie is friends with Steve Madden, (Jake Hoffman) woman’s shoe designer who wants to take his company public.  Stratton Oakmont takes the company public, and Jordan puts 85% of Steve Madden stock under his control, which is illegal.  By this time both the SEC and FBI are investigating Stratton Oakmont for shady securities practices.  As Jordan’s professional life deteriorates, his personal life is in similar disarray. Jordan has already divorced his first wife, and is having difficulties with his second wife, Naomi (Margot Robbie) because of Jordan’s predilection for hookers.  Jordan and Donnie also snort massive amounts of cocaine and take Quaaludes to come off the high.  To say the least, these vices mess with Jordan’s judgment, but he still can get out of serious jail time if he pleads guilty to a few minor SEC violations and steps down from Stratton, will he do it?

I like  The Wolf Of Wall Street a great deal. I expected to see Oliver Stone’s Wall Street, and instead I saw a much funnier take on the Wall Street culture, some of it was laugh out loud funny.  Sometimes, I think it was too funny for its own good. Jordan Belfort is  a real person, he did swindle lots o people out of their money, and at times, I felt like the movie treated his transgressions much too lightheartedly.  By the time the movie switches to a more serious tone, the pacing also slows down quite a bit. Martin Scorsese, who directed this movie, didn’t need so much detail in telling the story, and could have done a good bit of editing to help with the pacing.

Because it’s directed by Scorsese, The Wolf of Wall Street reminded me of Goodfellas.  Henry Hill and Jordan Belfort are very similar, they both put on the facade of being pillars of the community, while in reality they craved debauchery. Scorsese is extremely good at showing the dichotomy between the public and private lives of both men.

The acting is good.  Leonardo DeCaprio is very good as a man whose moral compass is broken, and who only cares about fulfilling his hedonistic needs.  DeCaprio turns from good time Charlie to raving lunatic in a flash, and that’s not easy to do, a lesser actor could have blown that role very easily. He also does the New York accent very well.  Margot Robbie does a really good job in a tough role as Belfort’s second wife Naomi, she plays Naomi as a very manipulative woman using sex as a weapon, but and she also stands up for herself when she needs to. She also handles the accent well, even though she’s from Australia.  I cannot for the life of me understand the casting of Jonah Hill in this movie, he plays Donnie Azoff as a complete moron, a goofball looking for his next score of money or drugs.  Hill has never failed to annoy me with his frat boy antics in any movie he’s in.  The streak continues.  I’m similarly puzzled by the casting of Rob Reiner as Jordan’s father.  Reiner plays the role strictly for laughs, which adds to the confused tone of the film.

Overall, a very good film, a bit long, and sometimes confused tonally, but still very good.

The Wolf Of Wall Street.  A great movie, a bit long in the tooth.